Public and Disputable Case File
Whitepaper and Platform User Guide
2026
The Rumbo Libertad Public and Disputable Case File is a public, disputable, and anonymous historical record platform, designed to operate in contexts of censorship, tyranny, and repression.
Its objective is not to act as a social network, an editorial medium, or a court of truth, but as an immutable public file where citizens can document events (e.g., human rights violations, corruption, censorship) ensuring that collective memory cannot be altered or erased.
In authoritarian regimes, the State seeks to monopolize memory, evidence, and the public narrative. Traditional platforms are vulnerable to censorship, data erasure, or pressure to reveal identities.
The Rumbo Libertad Public Case File exists because historical truth should not depend on a central custodian. The platform preserves allegations, evidence, and the contradictions between them (disputes) so that the truth can be reconstructed publicly in the future, regardless of suppression attempts.
The system is designed to be as easy to use as any modern web page, without requiring technical knowledge, cryptocurrencies, or user accounts.
To protect your identity and facilitate access:
If you are a witness or victim of an event that must remain in the historical record:
There are no moderators or judges to delete posts. If someone publishes incorrect information, a dispute is opened:
To structure files without resorting to data deletion, the platform uses a logical relationship graph that connects publications. Each participant decides the nature of their contribution using four main actions:
The platform offers advanced interactive tools for investigation:
Unlike individual records, which document isolated events (e.g., a specific arrest or censorship act at a certain time and place), Narratives are structured public theses or interpretations that group multiple independent records to tell a broader story.
"Pattern of coordinated arrests in State X"
"Isolated security operations without regional coordination"
To guarantee that the case file remains fair, secure, and immutable, the system operates under these strict rules:
No platform administrator can delete a claim for political or historical reasons. These controls do not constitute editorial validation of the truth of the file content.
The platform enforces zero tolerance for child sexual abuse material, sexual exploitation, non-consensual intimate content, malware, automated spam, and material that unnecessarily exposes victims, minors, or witnesses.
The platform may apply rate limits, automated spam analysis, anti-bot challenges, processing queues, file validation, malware filtering, size controls, and preventive suspension of abusive uploads. These controls are not intended to judge historical truth, but rather to protect the availability, security, and economic sustainability of the system.
Partial publications, secret evidence, or encrypted testimonies are not permitted. If you choose to contribute to the case file, everything you upload will be readable by the general public.
Reliability does not depend on "who" publishes (since everyone is anonymous), but on the strength of the evidence, metadata, and how that record survives disputes from other users over time.
Although the platform offers a fast and user-friendly experience (Web2), under the hood it uses decentralized storage and anchoring technology (Web3) to make it indestructible.
The platform will continue to evolve to strengthen the public record with features that expand analysis capabilities:
Allows users and organizations to group multiple independent claims to form argued historical timelines and complex analytical reports on patterns of repression or censorship.
Deepens the interactions between records so the community can not only "dispute" but also "support", "contextualize", or "expand" allegations in a structured way, shaping a robust citizen knowledge network.